
After questions and contradictions about Mitt Romney’s tenure at Bain followed by renewed pressure for him to release all of his tax returns, his campaign could benefit from a change of subject. Enter the Veepstakes: everyone’s favorite guessing game. Remember last week when Drudge reported that Condoleezza Rice was at the top of Romney’s list? That ridiculous head-fake was enough to turn heads and send the political world spinning away from Bain and taxes for hours.
The world of punditry thinks picking a VP now would be a deft political move to get the narrative off those pesky tax returns. The only problem with Romney announcing his pick - the two people presumed to be at the top of his list, Former Governor Tim Pawlenty and Ohio Senator Rob Portman are super boring. Sure, a “safe” VP choice might be better in the long run, but with the current media narrative, Romney needs someone who can pack a punch and neither of these men do that. If you ask politely they might give you a firm handshake, but that’s about it. If the speculation around Pawlenty and Portman already feels like watching paint dry then just wait until that white, eggshell finish is dry to the touch.
The American People may remember Tim Pawlenty best from what appeared to be an attempt to become the 2012 Republican nominee for president. During that short-lived campaign, he famously coined the term “Obamneycare” and then when asked to say it to Romney’s face infamously ran away from it. Beyond that, Tim Pawlenty loves the great American pastime: hockey on ice.
And what about Rob Portman? He is a senator from a crucial swing-state and, more importantly, has absolutely nailed the “middle-aged white guy in a prescription drug commercial” look. If America is looking for a vice president whom they can go on a bike ride with or walk a Golden Retriever with, then this is the guy.
If Romney wants his VP pick to dominate the news cycle neither of these men will do. So why not pick someone bold, someone exciting? Nobody votes for the #2 anyway so throw us a real curveball, Mitt. Herman Cain, Michele Bachmann, hell even your old pal Newt, will do. Choose one of those three and that’s all anybody will be talking about. By the time the novelty of a choice like that blows over the whole tax thing will be history - a history nobody will want to reopen. Romney’s money can accrue peacefully knowing it won’t be bothered as it sips Coronas and catches up on the latest Daniel Silva novel on a beach in Grand Cayman.
Realistically, Romney will go safe and choose Pawlenty or Portman. Neither will be enough to distract and drown out the calls for those missing years. When he does eventually release them the Romney campaign will need a big and lasting distraction. For that, maybe just release Condi’s taxes too.
Henry Melcher is a Graphics PA at Up w/ Chris Hayes and also runs the website posingwithfriends.com. Follow him at @hrmelcher.





Chris, absolutely love your new show..do have to dvr it as I work late and
am not normally up when it airs, but I do have one complaint. The pastry.
I keep finding myself looking at those pastries and get angry at the cravings they induce.
Now, perhaps the makers are an advertiser of yours, but if not,couldn't you put a bowl or
display of apples and pears or any other fruit or pinecones anything? I do my best
not to be 'artificially' induced into craving sweets and i find myself staring at that
platter and have to rewind in order to 'hear' the topic thread. Thanks for what I believe to be a pretty centrist conversation that covers some less talked about, but seriously important, topics. Please keep up the good work.
good work
What is the scoop on Bain having had an investment in a company
that serviced abortion providers before dropping the company? If this
is true, wouldn't that be the real reason not to release prior tax returns?
Apologize in advance, for not remembering the name of the company,
and not trying to stir up a hornets nest, but this seems far more logical
to me in polarizing his conservative base than sketchy, on the edge tax exemptions.
Think you can research this?
I would be great if Chris can take a brake from talking and allow the guests to share their views on topics being discussed. Otherwise, why have guests?
"take a break".
Chris,You have a great show and guests.Glad to see Amy Goodman on your show and please invite her back as much as possible.I hope you will talk about the NSA and them bugging,listening and tracking everything we do,everywhere we go,our banking transactions and everything we google.People need to know that we are being followed by BIG BROTHER at ALL TIMES...One other thing,can you not have so many commercialsif at all possible!Thanks,and glad I have a DVR so I can skip the commericals,ha-ha.Again,thanks for your great show and let others talk a little more...